Multiple Futures Project - Navigating Towards 2030
Issues:Competition over resources, Global militarisation, Marginalisation
The following is an excerpt from Multiple Futures Project (MFP) Findings and Recommendations:
The Multiple Futures tell the story of four plausible worlds in 2030, and are constructed to reflect their underlying logic and reasoning. None of these is what the future actually will be, but each provides a common ground for structured dialogue on the risks and vulnerabilities that will potentially endanger Alliance populations, territorial integrity, values and ideas.
The first future is called Dark Side of Exclusivity, and describes how globalization, climate change and resource scarcity significantly affect the capacity of states outside the globalized world to function effectively and meet the needs of their populations. Weak and failed states are sources of instability, and the states of the globalized world are faced with strategic choices on how to react.
The second future, called Deceptive Stability, refers to a world where advanced nations are preoccupied with societal change and how to manage the coming demographic shift as native populations age and young migrants fill the void. States in this world of relative benign stability are preoccupied. They focus inward on social cohesion, legal and illegal migration, and transnational issues related to diasporas. This leaves them ill-prepared to deal with geopolitical risk.
Clash of Modernities, the third future, sketches a world where a strong belief in rationalism, coupled with ingenuity and technological innovation, fuels and promotes horizontal connections between advanced networked societies across the globe. This network is challenged from the outside by authoritarian regimes of the hinterlands, and from within by a precarious balance between civil liberties and oversight by the state.
The fourth future is called New Power Politics, in which growing absolute wealth, including the widespread proliferation of WMD, has
increased the number of major powers, between whom there is now a tenuous balance. Globalization through trade integration and
internationally agreed standards is undermined as these powers compete for and impede global access to resources and spheres of
influence.
Each of the futures provides a backdrop for conceptual analysis. Together they present a canvas on which to evaluate risks, threats,
potential strategic surprises, implications and, of course, opportunities. The study has yielded a rich set of Risk Conditions, ranging from ‘failed states’ and ‘disruption of access to critical resources,’ to ‘increasing ethnic tension’ and the ‘challenge of conflicting values and world views.’ When linked with the six potential Sources of Threat identified in the MFP, the resulting Threatening Actions or Events yield 33 Security Implications and 26 Military Implications.
All Multiple Futures Project documents can be found here.
- Delicious
- Digg
- StumbleUpon
Posted on 23/11/09
Comments
Post new comment