Global militarisation

The current priority of the dominant security actors is maintaining international security through the vigorous use of military force combined with the development of both nuclear and conventional weapons systems. Post-Cold War nuclear developments involve the modernisation and proliferation of nuclear systems, with an increasing risk of limited nuclear-weapons use in warfare – breaking a threshold that has held for sixty years and seriously undermining multilateral attempts at disarmament. These dangerous trends will be exacerbated by developments in national missile defence, chemical and biological weapons and a race towards the weaponisation of space.

Articles EXCLUSIVELY written for sustainablesecurity.org

Issues:Climate change, Competition over resources, Global militarisation, Marginalisation

To browse a list of all of the articles EXCLUSIVELY written for sustainablesecurity.org - follow this link

Read more »

A Sustainable Security Approach to the 'War on Drugs'

Chris Abbott and Joel Vargas | Open Briefing | April 2012

Issue:Global militarisation

A new report from Open Briefing argues that the illicit drugs trade, and the militarised government responses to it, are the greatest threats to state and human security in the Americas. The report analyses the almost total failure of current strategies and outlines a sustainable security approach to address this.

Image source: truthout.org

Read more »

Kony 2012 and the Militarisation of Uganda

Adam Branch | AlJazeera | March 2012

Issue:Global militarisation

A piece written by Adam Branch and published by AlJazeera highlights the dangers of militarisation associated with the online campaign to make Joseph Kony 'famous' in 2012 spearheaded by the NGO Invisible Children. Branch asks "how often does the US government find millions of young Americans pleading that they intervene militarily in a place rich in oil and other resources?"

Image source: debobhappy

Read more »

Mutually Assured Destruction: Fifty Years and Counting

Tom de Castella | BBC News Magazine | February 2012

Issue:Global militarisation

Writing for the BBC, Tom de Castella explores the reasons why the fear of a nuclear exchange has receded in the public imagination. Marking the fiftieth anniversary of Robert McNamara’s speech to the American Bar Foundation that outlined the official US position on mutually assured destruction (MAD), de Castella talks to a number of experts about the continuing threat from nuclear stockpiles around the world.

Image source: Leeks. 

Read more »

A Realist Argument in Favour of Non-Violent Opposition in Syria

Daniel Serwer | The Atlantic | February 2012

Issue:Global militarisation

How can the state violence in Syria be stopped? Daniel Serwer argues in the Atlantic that, given the Syrian regime’s complete failure to protect its own citizens it may be morally justifiable to arm the Syrian opposition; however from a realist perspective it is neither ‘possible nor wise’ as a means to topple Assad and bring about accountable politics. A violent reaction to the state’s overwhelmingly superior violence would not only destroy the opposition’s legitimacy, but would eventually draw them into a militarised conflict that they could not win.

Serwer strongly advocates mass-participatory non-violent approaches which use tactics that are difficult to attribute to single individuals. In the end, removing the regime’s ability to instil fear will be the surest way to ensure its downfall, as seen in the cases of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali and Hosni Mubarak, and Serwer argues that this is still possible, even now after so much bloodshed.

Article Source: the Atlantic

Image Source: Yunchung Lee

Read more »

Militarisation and Negotiated Agreements: Avoiding the Pitfalls

Michael Krepon | Arms Control Wonk | February 2012

Issue:Global militarisation

Long-time and widely respected arms control watcher, Michael Krepon has written an interesting post on the Arms Control Wonk website about the perils of assuming that a negotiated outcome is always a good one. As the phrase goes, "the devil is in the detail" and looking very carefully at the relationship between militarisation and the provisions that get contained in treaties is all important.

Image source: UN.

Read more »